Abstract
Acoustic synthetic apertures are usually generated by coherent
summing of signals, correcting for phase shifts due to the lapse in
time as a receiver array moves to create the aperture. This
approach suffers from phase estimation errors arising from both
positioning errors of the moving receivers and from phase
instabilities in the signal. An incoherent synthetic aperture can
be created if compact broadband signals are used, avoiding phase
error problems. Furthermore, since no overlapping sensors are
required for phase estimation, a synthetic aperture can in
principle be created from a single moving receiver. This paper
investigates the feasibility and expected performance of an
incoherent synthetic aperture constructed by moving a single
acoustic receiver in the vertical plane. The application discussed
in this paper is to evaluate the focal region of an Acoustic Time
Reversal Mirror (TRM) where the receiver platform is an
Autonomous-Profiling Vehicle (APV). The APV is a modified
commercial product from Ocean Sensors in San Diego, USA, and
carries an acoustic data acquisition payload designed by the
Acoustic Research Laboratory. The APV has the ability to profile in
the vertical plane, guided by a taut vertical mooring line, or to
zigzag in a series of progressively displaced vertical profiles as
it drifts freely with currents. The APV also monitors conductivity,
temperature and depth, so that the sound speed profile and the
depth of the receiver at each pulse reception can be reconstructed.
Numerical propagation models are used to simulate the performance
of such an incoherent synthetic aperture array during shallow water
TRM experiment to validate the overall performance prior to
conducting sea-trials. Both Fast Field (SPARC) and Normal Mode
(Kraken C) models are applied. The temporal-spatial ambiguity
problem is considered with respect to the time it takes to form the
aperture compared to the coherence time of the TRM focussing,
limited by the coherence time of the shallow-water waveguide. We
also present some CTD and acoustic data taken by the modified
APV.
| |